5. Discussion and conclusions
This section discusses the main findings by means of three working propositions that stress the emerging role of collaboration standards and their impact on contractual and relational governance mechanisms in complex projects. It also elucidates research and managerial contributions as well as limitations and avenues for further research.
5.1 Discussion
This study provides new insights regarding the governance of collaboration in complex projects, especially about the emerging role of standards. The extant literature stresses the ability to collaborate effectively and develop related norms in project settings (e.g. Davies et al., 2016). Developing shared collaboration norms amongst project partners requires significant time, which poses challenges in the context of time-limited projects (DeFillippi and Sydow, 2016; Jones et al., 1997). The findings highlight the importance of the collaboration standard ISO 44001, the adoption of which may even constitute a prerequisite for tendering for complex projects. The study shows that the adoption of the collaboration standard and the pre-contract evaluation of project partners’ collaborative competence have emerged as specific responses to prior performance failures associated with competitive bidding and the resulting fragmented, adversarial relationships (e.g. Egan Report, 1998; Government Construction Strategy, 2016).