دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی ارزیابی چهار حالت ضد انعقادی خون با دوز پایین در طول همودیالیز مداوم – اشپرینگر ۲۰۱۸
|عنوان فارسی:||ارزیابی چهار حالت ضد انعقادی خون با دوز پایین در طول همودیالیز مداوم|
|عنوان انگلیسی:||An evaluation of four modes of low-dose anticoagulation during intermittent haemodialysis|
|تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی : 8||تعداد صفحات ترجمه فارسی : ترجمه نشده|
|سال انتشار : 2018||نشریه : اشپرینگر - springer|
|فرمت مقاله انگلیسی : PDF||کد محصول : E6234|
|محتوای فایل : PDF||حجم فایل : Kb 500|
|رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله: پزشکی|
|گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله: داروسازی، خون شناسی|
|مجله: مجله اروپایی فارماکولوژی بالینی - European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology|
|دانشگاه: Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine - University of Umea - Umea - Sweden|
|کلمات کلیدی: همودیالیز، خونریزی، آغازگر، ضد انعقاد|
Introduction Intensive care participants that need dialysis frequently suffer from increased risk of bleeding. Standard intermittent haemodialysis (SHD) includes anticoagulation to avoid clotting of the dialysis system. The aim of this study was to clarify which of four different low-dose anticoagulant modes was preferable in reducing the exposure to i.v. unfractionated heparin (heparin) and maintaining patency of the dialysis circuit. Methods Twenty-three patients on SHD were included to perform haemodialysis with four modes of low-dose anticoagulation. For comparative analyses, patients served as their own control. Haemodialysis with a single bolus of tinzaparin at the start was compared to haemodialysis initiated without i.v. heparin but priming with (1) heparin in saline (H), (2) heparin and albumin in saline (HA), (3) heparin and albumin in combination with a citrate-containing dialysate (HAC), (4) saline and usinga heparincoated filters (Evodial®). The priming fluid was discarded before dialysis started. Blood samples were collected at 0, 30 and 180 min during haemodialysis. Smaller bolus doses of heparin (500 Units/dose) were allowed during the modes to avoid interruption by clotting. Findings The mean activated partial thromboplastin (APTT) time as well as the doses of anticoagulation administered was highest with SHD and least with HAC and Evodial®. Mode H versus SHD had the highest rate of prematurely interrupted dialyses (33%, p = 0.008). The urea reduction rate was less with Evodial® vs. SHD (p < 0.01). One hypersensitivity reaction occurred with Evodial®. Changes in blood cell concentrations and triglycerides differed between the modes. Discussion If intermittent haemodialysis is necessary in patients at risk of bleeding, anticoagulation using HAC and Evodial® appeared most preferable with least administration of heparin, lowest APTT increase and lowest risk for prematurely clotted dialyzers in contrast to the least plausible H mode.
This study included four low-dose heparin modes that could be used for patients needing intermittent HD while having an increased risk for bleeding. The least need of additional heparin and change in APTT were found using HAC and Evodial®. UsingEvodial® causedone hypersensitivity reaction. Preparing a central dialysis catheter with a heparin-containing lock solution may cause a much greater increase of APTT than a small bolus of heparin during the dialysis.