ترجمه مقاله نقش ضروری ارتباطات 6G با چشم انداز صنعت 4.0
- مبلغ: ۸۶,۰۰۰ تومان
ترجمه مقاله پایداری توسعه شهری، تعدیل ساختار صنعتی و کارایی کاربری زمین
- مبلغ: ۹۱,۰۰۰ تومان
Abstract
Purpose – Employability has been suggested as an alternative to job security in response to more flexible work arrangements, arguing that the important question for employees is no longer the security of their current job, but their employment security in the labour market. The purpose of this paper is to test two core assumptions of this argument: first, is employability associated with a lower preference for job security? And second, are individuals with lower job security in fact compensated with higher employability? Both assumptions have received criticism in recent literature. The focus is on employees’ perceived basic and aspiring employability. The former refers to employees’ expectations of remaining in employment and the latter to expectations of upward mobility. Design/methodology/approach – The data used in the analysis were nationally representative Norwegian survey data from 12,945 employees (2009–2013). Findings – Employees with higher aspiring employability and education levels have a significantly lower preference for job security, but this is not the case for employees with higher basic employability. Additionally, while employees with lower job security have higher aspiring employability, they have lower basic employability and receive less employer-supported training. Originality/value – The current paper is the first to investigate how employability relates to the employees’ own preference for job security. In line with critics of the employability argument, the results support that job security continues to be an important protection mechanism. Moreover, employees with low job security lose out twice as employers also invest less in their training and future employability.
Conclusion
In public and academic debates, increased use of temporary contracts and reduced job security among employees are defended with reference to employability as the new protection mechanism in the labour market (Forrier and Sels, 2003). The current paper is the first to investigate how employability relates to the employees’ own preference for job security. The results partially support the fact that increased employability can reduce employees’ preference for job security. However, the relationship between employability and the preference for job security is only significant for aspiring employability and education, nd not for basic employability. It is likely that the trade-off between job security and employability is more attractive for employees on an upwardly mobile career path than for employees who risk dropping out of the labour market. Furthermore, the relationship between the preference for job security on one hand and aspiring employability and education on the other seems to be moderate to weak, indicating that high employability might reduce, but not remove, employees’ desire for job security.