Discussion and conclusion
In the public sector, the views of civil servants are important during the implementation of policy (Tummers, 2011), especially so regarding how successfully a given organization can interact with and learn from its environment (Coursey, Yang, & Pandey, 2012; Moynihan, 2003). However, although the literature on collaboration in the public sector is extensive, quantitative studies examining how civil servants perceive inter-organizational collaboration are few. Because of this, this study can make several contributions to the literature. However, before turning to these, a key limitation of the analysis should be noted. In addition to the problem of CMV discussed above, an important shortcoming of cross-sectional data is its lack of temporal separation between measurements, making it impossible to present convincing causal relationships between variables. While it is not clear how preferences for collaboration could influence perceptions of leadership or other organizational characteristics, future research could adopt an experimental or longitudinal research approach to more convincingly deal with the issue of causality. This limitation should be kept in mind throughout the following discussion of this study’s results.