6. Conclusions
The content of the S-ERP framework is evaluated using peer review method, which involved 12 experts from sustainability and ERP implementation field for data collection. The peer review process enables the improvement of structure and quality of the framework. The collected data are then qualitatively analysed through three main activities: data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. Accordingly, the initial S-ERP framework needs to be classified into two parts, namely sustainability implementation framework and system implementation framework.
The present study gives a significant contribution to academic and practice. In academic viewpoint, this study will improve the research growth in S-ERP systems implementation. The S-ERP framework fills in the knowledge gap and completes the structure of the S-ERP systems master plan. In practical viewpoint, the S-ERP framework is useful for organisations in practising sustainability. The framework provides the important aspects of transforming the organisations towards sustainable organisations and sustainably integrated organisations. By evaluating the S-ERP framework through experts, the quality and reliability of the framework have been improved. This is valuable for practitioners as they need a reliable technique to guide them in implementing the S-ERP systems. In addition, the implementation of S-ERP systems is advantageous for organisations in terms of decision-making process since the integrated systems can generally streamline the sustainable business operations and reduce the energy consumption up to 40 % (Monk and Wagner, 2012).