ترجمه مقاله نقش ضروری ارتباطات 6G با چشم انداز صنعت 4.0
- مبلغ: ۸۶,۰۰۰ تومان
ترجمه مقاله پایداری توسعه شهری، تعدیل ساختار صنعتی و کارایی کاربری زمین
- مبلغ: ۹۱,۰۰۰ تومان
Abstract
A series of defaults, a distinctive corporate environment and inconclusive findings in literature make Australia an interesting case in which to investigate the association between corporate governance and default risk. Using a large panel of 1,086 non-financial firms from 2001 to 2013, we find that better governed firms are strongly associated with a lower level of default risk, and that the association is stronger among firms with more growth opportunities. Moreover, empirical evidence supports the role of stock liquidity as a channel of the relationship. Overall these findings have practical implications for the stakeholders in Australia.
9. Conclusion
We contribute to the ongoing debate in literature: Does corporate governance quality affect default risk? It is timely and imperative to investigate the relationship between CGQ and default risk in the Australian context for three reasons. First, CGQ is the prime reason behind a series of defaults that occurred in Australia. Second, the Australian context—High agency costs, high ownership concentration, weak market for control and low litigation risk—is unique, so findings from other countries may not directly apply to Australia. Third, the scant Australian literature provides inconclusive evidence on the relationship between CGQ and default risk, when the endogeneity bias is considered.
Compared to Schultz et al. (2015), who use the sample of large Australian firms over the short period of 2001 to 2007, we provide additional evidence on the governance-default linkage by investigating such a relationship using firms from the different size groups (small, medium and large) over the long period from 2001 to 2013. Moreover, compared to the individual governance mechanisms used by Schultz et al. (2015), we employ a composite internal governance score based on the Horwath report. Furthermore, unlike Schultz et al. (2015), who employ only a market-based (DD and PD) proxy, we employ both market-based (DD, CDS and PD) and accounting-based (ALTMAN) proxies for default risk. Finally, we address endogeneity bias by using lagged independent variables, an instrumental variable approach, and dynamic panel data estimation techniques.