CONCLUSION
Project management guidance allows for variations in implementation in practice based on individual organizational characteristics (Besner & Hobbs, 2013; Fernandes et al., 2014; Konstantinou, 2015). There is recognition that approaches need to be varied based on the culture and needs of the organizations in which they are applied (van der Linde & Steyn, 2016). One way that organizations determine how to apply project management techniques is to examine how other, similar organizations have adapted them for their own projects (Popa, 2015). There are over a hundred practices, tools, and techniques available in the project management toolkits assembled by the Project Management Institute and other sources that can be employed by librarians seeking to undertake projects within their organization (Besner & Hobbs, 2013, p. 18), giving each project manager a significant amount of choice and options for customization. This chapter does not propose to provide “best practices” for how to implement a library project, but provides an illustration of one way of approaching projects supported by evidence from the project management and change management literature which librarians and other information science practitioners can add to their project toolkits. Understanding that change management practices as well as the processes of project management should be combined in project initiatives because most of the projects that librarians undertake involve the introduction of some form of change for either library staff or patrons can allow them to design their projects in ways that address some of the known barriers to change and therefore increase the likelihood of project success.