IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
In this paper, we classified the 2-class MI tasks using the ear-around EEG. And, the performance was compared with that of the motor area to verify the feasibility of the motor imagery classification in the ear-EEG. The proposed method showed better performance than the other methods by finding the optimal frequency-band through the spectral and the temporal filter. However, as expected, ear-EEG based MI classification showed lower accuracies compared with using motor area EEG signals. Note that the performance of the ‘Ear’ with the ‘Motor’, it showed 77.71% and 74.28%, respectively (Table I and II). In this study, we used conventional EEG electrodes attaching around the ear far away approximately 1.5 cm from the ear. However, in future work, we will evaluate the proposed method using ear-EEG electrodes that more close to the ear.