6 Conclusions and implications
6.1 The theoretical account: facts and aspirations
Notwithstanding the dilemmas and the divergences that persist among the jurisdictions covered herein, a few conclusions lend to be formulated from the above elaboration. On a scholarly, theoretical front, these seem to be the most prominent ones. First, it is a fact that the fresh start-based approach (or second chance philosophy) to bankruptcy law is the first ranking priority for numerous bankruptcy laws now at the outset of the twenty-first century, from the European Union, its Member States to China. As an introduction of such a new system presumes a major paradigm change going considerably beyond mere passage of new laws, the achievements cannot be but modest in the short run. Second, as the nature of consumer and business bankruptcies differs significantly, the corollary problems that need to be addressed in the process of introducing a fresh start-based law are as well distinct. This notwithstanding that there is some overlap, too. It is of relevance as well that the interest in, and consequently the hereinbefore reform results, differ significantly with respect to the two segments of bankruptcy laws as well. Third, it is a fact that more and more jurisdictions recognize the legitimacy of providing ‘honest but unfortunate’ individuals (consumer debtors) with fresh start. The new consumer bankruptcy laws, however, do not follow a single pattern, rather they tend to meaningfully diverge. Although US law is one of the models that is advisable to be consulted in this domain as well by those who would like to learn from best globally available practices, it is far from being a success story.