6. Conclusion
Prior literature (Abbott et al., 2013; Daugherty et al., 2011) suggests that clients perceive GAAP-deficient PCAOB inspection reports to be a signal of low audit quality and respond in the form of auditor dismissal. We investigate the effects of the auditor's response, which is also included in the PCAOB inspection report, on the auditor dismissal decision. We find that GAAP-deficient, triennially inspected auditors that dispute the PCAOB findings are far less likely to be dismissed when a client has an audit committee director with accounting-related financial expertise. Our results suggest that knowledgeable members of the audit committee read PCAOB inspection reports and consider both the PCAOB's and the auditor's perspectives when making decisions about auditor dismissal/retention.
Our study presents evidence suggesting that auditors' responses contain important information that is used by audit committees and other stakeholders to evaluate the auditor. Prior research focuses on information provided by the PCAOB (Abbott et al., 2013; Daugherty et al., 2011; Dee, Lulseged, & Zhang, 2011; Nagy, 2014). Our evidence indicates that the auditor's response is another important signal that relays the auditor's perspective on the PCAOB inspection process. Given the continually evolving nature of the auditing and inspection processes, we encourage future research on the economic, accounting and audit quality implications of the PCAOB inspection process.