دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی باز کردن محله های تازه ی باز: نمونه ای از شهر هوشمند بی حاصل - امرالد 2017

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to satisfy a clear gap in the main field of open innovation research whereabouts a very little scholarship try to analyze the mechanisms of innovative milieu down smart cities environments by applying through innovative projects that seem to support efficiently the entry of private firms and citizens in public collaborations. Design/methodology/approach – The research performed an exploratory and qualitative evaluation based on the case study method built on the evaluation of organizational behavior and urban boosting innovation through smart city initiatives. In doing so, after a literature review in smart city as well in lean methodology fields, the case of Turin Smart City follows. Findings – As acknowledged by international literature, the paper shows how a lean approach enables local government to define and realize smart projects and initiatives in a faster and more effective way. Particularly, the government in one of the main cities in Italy, id est Turin, combines a lean methodology with the job-to-be done approach, according a new concept of smart initiatives involving a startup mentality for the lead users which enables interesting predictions relating the human aspects of open collaborations. Research limitations/implications – The specificity of this inquiry highlights valuable insights from double-gate smart cities’ innovation, social and urban as well. The research is largely interpretative and exploratory and while this provides a solid scientific foundation for further research, it does not, itself, subject any hypothesis to statistical testing and validation. Originality/value – Since the city approached the smart city subject in a lean way, it was able to realize some projects in a faster way. Through specific initiatives, the city acquires the ability to involve more and better all its stakeholders such as citizens, companies, and public employees, among others. In this regard, the paper invigorates managerial debates concerning the urban and social aspects of open innovation ecosystems which represent in our minds a superior level of open innovation, testbeds of positive knowledge, and stimulus of knowledge dissemination process around the city.

Conclusions, implications, and future perspectives

In conclusion, from this exploratory research, the study deems that smart city projects could be developed taking into consideration different factors, such as social and stakeholder engagement, citizens’ startup mentality, firms’ commitment, and strategic public control (Bresciani et al., 2017). This approach serves as forerunner for the construction of a new conceptual and practical framework, which will rebuild the smart city based on social entrepreneurial intensity (Morris, 1998).

This research aims to understand how disruptive innovation could circulate within complex local systems, encompassing open innovation mechanisms and practices, and furthering the ways in which the opening of technological gates to urban smart networks can spread external sources of knowledge (Lhuillery and Pfister, 2009; Pisano et al., 2014).