5. Conclusion: science, evidence and policy co-evolving
This essay finishes with some further examples of where science, evidence and policy have evolved together. These give, at the very least, proof of concept that even scientific issues freighted with value and risk can be considered and move forward.
One important strand is the way in which the science community reflects and responds. The emergence of new science itself changes the scientific agenda and becomes a source of meaningful questions for the same or different disciplines. Work by the Royal Society and many others has helped ensure that research on geo-engineering across disciplines is leading to phased insights. A similar pattern is reflected in the “web of protection” around biosecurity. The Society’s project on machine learning in turn helped inform new research agendas in areas such as interpretability, or human-machine partnerships.
A second strand is the evidence that society does not have to be the victim of technological determinism or of existing views of human nature. There is a growing body of investigation into how major policy shifts – the introduction of Human Rights legislation, for example – take place and how evidence and scholarship, public debate, law, policy and practice intertwine. A study by the Institute of Government (The S Factors, 2011) found common patterns in areas where policy had changed over 20 or 40 years, to positions that would not have been considered possible at the start, such as smoking going from high status to being banned in public places, or the introduction of the UK’s Climate Change Act with its statutory carbon budgets.