5. Conclusion
Often, new management frameworks, tools, and ways of doing things enter the practitioner space, gain acceptance and ever-wider adoption, and become integral to business models and processes. Meanwhile, the world changes. Therefore, every now and then it is useful to step back and ask if the tried-and-true frameworks, tools, processes, and practices are as relevant today as they were when they were first conceived and adopted. Razorand-blades pricing is a case in point. There were–—and still are–—good reasons in support of razor-and-blades pricing. But here, too, the world has changed–—especially given the advent of the Internet, the widespread adoption of social media, more informed and much-advised customers, the popularity of open standards and the growth of the maker movement, disparities among societies regarding respect of intellectual property rights, and long and information-leaking supply chains. These are but a few developments that call into question the present-day tenability of razor-andblades pricing. What is clear is that while reports of razor-andblades pricing’s death may be exaggerated, there clearly is a case for revisiting the model. This article does that. It outlines the what, why, and how of razor-and-blades pricing; it questions the presentday tenability of razor-and-blades pricing; and it suggests the impetus for innovative alternatives to razor-and-blades pricing by suggesting new pricing models and purchasing arrangements, value-proposition redefinition, rethinking productcomplementary product system architecture, and redefinition of value delivery.