دانلود رایگان مقاله پیش بینی خطر بیماریهای قلبی عروقی و آنژیوگرافی عروق کرونر با آنالیز پالس

عنوان فارسی
کاربرد بالینی آنالیز پالس و حجم دیجیتال در پیش بینی خطر بیماریهای قلبی عروقی و علت آنژیوگرافی عروق کرونر
عنوان انگلیسی
Clinical utility of digital volume pulse analysis in prediction of cardiovascular risk and the presence of angiographic coronary artery disease
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
7
سال انتشار
2015
نشریه
الزویر - Elsevier
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
کد محصول
E1175
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
پزشکی
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
قلب و عروق
مجله
تحقیقات عروق - Artery Research
دانشگاه
گروه قلب و عروق و مرکز قلب Michaelidion، یونان
کلمات کلیدی
حجم پالس های دیجیتال، سفتی شریان ها، شاخص سفتی، سرعت موج پالس، عروق کرونر، مرض، خطر بیماریهای قلبی عروقی
چکیده

Abstract


Background: Stiffness Index (SI), assessed by finger photoplethysmography (digital volume pulse analysis), has been suggested as a simple and easy measure of arterial stiffness. However, its potential association with cardiovascular risk and coronary artery disease (CAD) has been little studied. The aims of the study were to investigate the relation of SI with classical risk factors and established arterial stiffness indices and its ability to predict cardiovascular risk and the presence of angiographic CAD. Methods: We enrolled 126 consecutive patients (mean age 61 years, 74% males) with suspected stable CAD undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Cardiovascular risk was assessed using Framingham risk score (FRS) and the European Heart score. Carotid-femoral (PWVcf) and carotid-radial (PWVcr) pulse wave velocity and augmentation index, using applanation tonometry, and SI using finger photoplethysmography, were measured in all patients. Results: SI was positively correlated with PWVcr (p Z 0.017) but not with PWVcf. Increased SI (R2 0.19, p < 0.001) was independently associated with higher diastolic blood pressure and male gender. Increased SI and PWVcf were associated with higher FRS and Heart score (p < 0.05 for all), while only higher PWVcf was associated with the presence of angiographic CAD (p Z 0.007). Conclusions: SI, easily derived using finger photoplethysmography, was related to classical risk factors and peripheral arterial rather than aortic stiffness. SI and PWVcf were the only vascular indices associated with cardiovascular risk, but only PWVcf was related to the presence of coronary atherosclerosis. Further research is needed to clarify the value of this useful index of arterial stiffness in risk stratification.

نتیجه گیری

Discussion


Stiffness Index, assessed by DVP analysis using photoplethysmography, has been previously suggested as a measure of arterial stiffness.18 Its simple, easy and rapid acquisition in the finger would make it a very appealing tool in the evaluation of cardiovascular risk via the assessment of arterial stiffness. However, the use of SI in clinical practice is very limited compared to other indices of arterial stiffness. Applanation tonometry has been widely used for several decades to derive PWVcf and PWVcr, indices of aortic and peripheral arterial stiffness, and AIx, a more complex index determined both by the aortic stiffness and the reflections of the pulse wave from the peripheral circulation. PWVcf and AIx have been extensively studied in relation to cardiovascular risk factors and independently associated with cardiovascular prognosis.


بدون دیدگاه