دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی دیدگاه خط مشی عمومی در گروه پویای تصمیم گیری در خط مشی خارجی - وایلی 2018

عنوان فارسی
دیدگاه خط مشی عمومی در گروه پویای تصمیم گیری در خط مشی خارجی
عنوان انگلیسی
Public Policy Perspective on Group Decision-Making Dynamics in Foreign Policy
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
22
سال انتشار
2018
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
نشریه
وایلی - Wiley
کد محصول
E8163
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت، علوم سیاسی
کلمات کلیدی
تصمیم گیری گروهی، سیاست خارجی، تصمیم گیری در مورد امنیت ملی، چرخه سیاست، تفکر گروهی، تفکر چند گانه، con-div، ISIS
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت استراتژیک
مجله
مجله مطالعات سیاسی - Policy Studies Journal
چکیده

Research on decision making in foreign policy and national security has had little interaction with the field of public policy. This review connects the two fields. We utilize a key public policy concept, the policy cycle, to provide a framework for our review of group decision-making dynamics in national security and foreign policy. We describe key stages of the policy cycle followed by a review of the leading models of group decision-making dynamics. We then construct a bridge between the two, demonstrating how specific stages of the policy cycle are typically associated with specific group decision-making dynamics. To illustrate this link we provide an example of decision-making dynamics within the Obama administration throughout policy stages of the 2016 campaign against the Islamic State in Raqqa, Syria.

نتیجه گیری

Conclusion

 

In the Raqqa offensive example, we illustrated group decision-making dynamics in the context of policy cycle stages. We demonstrated how dominant group dynamics in this particular foreign policy decision-making process shifted throughout stages of the policy cycle. The more successful group dynamic of con-div was dominant during policy formulation. However this quickly shifted to the suboptimal group dynamic of groupthink at the decision-making stage. Finally, the polythink dynamic dominated the stage of implementation when tactical questions required action. A single illustration has little empirical, external validity, but the example should encourage scholars to connect the fields of public policy and foreign policy decision making and continue to test the assertions presented in this article.


بدون دیدگاه