منوی کاربری
  • پشتیبانی: ۴۲۲۷۳۷۸۱ - ۰۴۱
  • سبد خرید

دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی مقدمه ای برای بحث ویژه درباره ی تصمیم گیری چند معیاره: روند های آینده - وایلی 2018

عنوان فارسی
مقدمه ای برای بحث ویژه درباره ی تصمیم گیری چند معیاره: چالش های فعلی و روند های آینده
عنوان انگلیسی
Preface to the Special Issue on Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Current Challenges and Future Trends
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
3
سال انتشار
2018
نشریه
وایلی - Wiley
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
کد محصول
E7174
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
مهندسی صنایع
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
برنامه ریزی و تحلیل سیستم ها، بهینه سازی سیستم ها
مجله
معاملات بین المللی در تحقیقات عملیاتی - International Transactions in Operational Research
۰.۰ (بدون امتیاز)
امتیاز دهید
بخشی از متن مقاله

The pioneers of South Carolina: The genesis of MCDM


It seems suitable to introduce this special issue by giving a few brushstrokes to frame the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) paradigm within a historical perspective. In this direction, we consider that the starting point of the MCDM movement was possibly in 1951, when Koopmans established the concept of efficient or non-dominated vector that was later developed by Kuhn and Tucker to obtain the optimality conditions for the existence of non-dominated solutions. Following another direction, Charnes and Cooper, in 1955 and 1961, introduced the basic idea of goal programming, first within a constrained regression context, and second for addressing the issue of incompatibilities among constraints of linear programming problems. There are also remarkable precursors to this paradigm, like the introduction in 1968 of the outranking relationships as a foundation of the ELECTRE methods by Roy, as well as the publication one year later by Raiffa of a memorandum of the RAND Corporation, where the seminal ideas of the multi-attribute utility theory were introduced. These fundamental contributions clearly indicate that since its origins MCDM is firmly rooted with the classic optimization principles, which the new paradigm aims to extend and to increase its empirical corroboration capacity. In other words, MCDM aims to increase the understanding of how people make decisions, as well as to provide decision makers with sound analytical tools to aid in making sensible decisions.


بدون دیدگاه