6. Conclusion and perspectives
Mobility of nodes in WSN with 6LoWPAN technology involves many advantages and functionalities for the needed applications. However, it represents a major challenge to face, because of its impacts and changes on this kind of network. In this paper, the state-of-art of mobility support protocols was surveyed. We began our work by introducing the challenges required to design a mobil- ity management. Then, the classification criteria of mobility sup- port protocols were proposed. The choice of such criteria depends on the used application and the needed performances. Based on these criteria, a comparative study of the existing proto- cols was presented to discuss the effect of each used criterion on the performances of the 6LoWPAN networks. After our study and analysis of the existing protocols, the major conclusion to be drawn is that there is no efficient solution to meet all the requirements and constraints of WSN with 6LoWPAN Technology. Thus, some improvements are still required. More- over, the micro mobility was observed to affect the routing path within the LoWPAN. Hence, the micro mobility cannot be treated without considering the routing protocol. IETF ROLL working group proposed a routing protocol for LoW Power and Lossy Networks 1061 called ‘‘RPL’’. This protocol might be considered in our future work to support mobility over the routing protocol in WSN with 6LoW- PAN technology.