5. Conclusion
Food waste leads to loss of valuable resources, such as energy, water, land and labour and to unnecessary emissions of pollutants. The research described here investigated supermarket food waste by categorising and quantifying the waste at a supermarket, assessing the environmental impacts of the waste and suggesting alternative ways to treat the waste in order to reduce its environmental footprint.
The life cycle assessment results reported here reveal that the annual wastage of bread and beef products have the largest contribution to the environmental footprint of the supermarket. Compared to the other waste fractions included in the LCA, the annual bread waste has the largest contribution to the total mass of the food waste, the economic costs incurred by the supermarket and the environmental impacts in ozone depletion, freshwater ecotoxicity and resource depletion categories. Beef waste has the largest contribution to particulate matter, photochemical ozone formation, acidification as well as terrestrial and freshwater eutrophication categories.
Alternative waste treatment scenarios, that require separation of the food waste from its packaging at the supermarket and that allows for material recycling of the packaging and the use of bread waste as animal feed, have the potential to reduce the emissions of CO2eq. by as much as 1027 and 1549 kg per year respectively, in comparison with the current waste treatment practiced by the supermarket.