Conclusion
Our research question focused on the impact of accounting standards on treasurers' hedging decisions. Towards that aim, we conducted a qualitative research project involving forty-eight semi-structured interviews. Our findings confirm the impact, both on the activity of the treasurer and on his/her relationships with professionals in the area of finance, control and auditing. Furthermore, the interviews confirm the phenomenon described by Baudrillard, that of confusion between the map (the accounting results) and the territory (the economic decisions). The interviewees pointed to fear of increased earnings volatility and excessive complexity of the regulation as sources of confusion. This is consistent with the literature on similar changes in the US environment (Evans et al., 1978; Wilner 1982; Zhang, 2009). Our observation of the actual process (van de Ven, 1992) provides a double contribution. Firstly, our approach focuses on perceptions and practices rather than the variables that are studied through statistical analysis and experiments. On the other hand, we complement early works to highlight the complexity of the economic decisions. The behavior of corporate treasurers is multiple and is not a static variable. We have seen that in face of the fear of volatility, which is perceived as a real problem by most treasurers, attitudes are not homogenous. The outcomes are often the result of negotiation, compromise, or trial and error, a process in which the treasurer is one actor among others. We have represented this dialectic using a scheme that links the territory to the map via modeling through the standards, and where the map influences the territory.