4. Discussion and implications
This research began by noting that the pertinent literature neglects aspects of how service innovations are actually implemented. In particular, whereas the role of FLEs in service innovation generation receives significant attention (e.g., Engen & Magnusson,2015; Karlsson & Skålen, 2015; Santos-Vijande, L opez-S anchez, & Rudd, 2015), the role of FLEs in SII is less explored. Thus, this research heeds the call for more studies concerning the role of FLEs in implementing service innovations (Cadwallader et al., 2010). This study also addresses the call by reputation researchers to consider 1) employees as an important stakeholder group (Helm, 2013), and 2) reputation outcomes, which have so far been neglected (Walsh, Bartikowski, & Beatty, 2014). To address these voids, this study introduced a model linking FLEs' PER with their tendency to recommend newly introduced services. Additionally, two possible pathways by which PER affects SII, which are respectively based on an efficiency-oriented perspective and a social-political perspective of innovative work behavior, were identified. Except for H6, which was only partially supported in Study 2, all hypotheses received support across two contexts. 4