Conclusions
Animal welfare, public health and safety, and species and ecological conservation have endured decades of sufferance and harm as the result of the exotic pet trade being significantly out of reasonable control. Regulations, whether mandatory or as codes of practice, have failed to prevent or abate the range of issues concerned. Post animal acquisition educational “cures” have not worked, and best evidence implies that this trend will continue, given that the more we learn about animal needs, the more apparent it becomes that they cannot be met in the restrictive conditions of domestic captivitydand arguably also within the professional zoological sector.
There is a strong and urgent need for an objective, balanced, and proportionate means of labeling pet animals (particularly exotic species) to facilitate informed decision-making by prospective purchasers and safeguard animal welfare, public health, species conservation, and the environment. Current and future remedial emphasis needs to be directed at prevention and hence focused on preacquisition information and decision-making. The use of positive lists in conjunction with the EMODE-based pet labeling scheme would be strongly and mutually self-augmenting.
The EMODE-based pet labeling scheme we propose offers a long overdue approach to bringing pet animal trading in line with other industries that are already obliged to comply with relevant standards and therefore responsible product description and selling, and also benefits from its user-friendly design, independence, and evidence-based structure. Proposal of a pet labeling scheme does not, however, imply condonation of trading or keeping exotic pets but rather aims to promote much needed greater responsibility within the industry.