5. Summary and Conclusions
This paper has investigated the association between the adoption of an AC and firm’s value using a sample of 63 financial institutions from 2000-2011. This empirical research has underpinned the finding that the establishment of an AC has a positive and statistically significant effect on a firm’s value. The pre-crisis period also indicates that the establishment of an AC has a positive and statistically significant effect on a firm’s value. However, the establishment of an AC did not impact on a firm’s value during the postfinancial crisis period. The post-crisis results indicate that an AC has no statistically significant relationship with a firm’s value. Our results suggest that, even though the financial crisis was over after 2009, the entire UK economy was still experiencing the effects of an economic downturn and financial firms were no exception (Review of HM Treasury’s response to the financial crisis report, 2012)3 .
This paper contributes to the existing theoretical corporate governance literature in the following ways: the paper reaffirms that the corporate governance code in the UK addresses any agency costs that exist among firms, and the adoption of an AC as part of a best corporate governance practice will help reduce agency costs and information asymmetry by ensuring that a firm’s activities are conducted in line with the principal’s and the agent’s expectations. Therefore, our result is consistent with agency theory predictions. The paper also gives a better understanding of AC adoption and its financial impact on UK financial institutions. This supports the given hypotheses and attests that the adoption of an AC by a UK financial institution will improve their corporate governance mechanisms.