14. Conclusions
The highlights of TAF could be summarized as follows: (i) TAF is equally potent as an antiretrovirus agent at a 30-fold lower dose (10 mg as compared to 300 mg) than TDF. This reduces the risk of toxicity for TAF by a factor of 30-fold as well. (ii) In fact, TAF, as compared to TDF, has been shown to signifi- cantly reduce kidney (glomerular and tubular) disturbances and bone mineral (spine, hip) density changes. (iii) TAF should also offer a reduced risk of these kidney and bone side effects when used for PrEP, for which TDF in combination with ()FTC (emtricitabine) (marketed as Truvada) has been approved in the US since 2012. (iv) Akin to TDF, TAF leads to little or negligible emergence of drug resistance (to tenofovir), and this is likely to be further decreased given the lower dosage of TAF as compared to TDF. (v) TAF, due to its antiretrovirus potency, combined with its virtually complete safety, might form the cornerstone for longterm, or even lifelong use, in the treatment of HIV infections. (vi) TAF has so far been approved for clinical use in combination with elvitegravir, cobicistat and emtricitabine (marketed as Genvoya), with emtricitabine (marketed as Descovy) and with rilpivirine and emtricitabine (marketed as Odefsey), and this use is likely to be extended in the future to other combinations, including, i.e., darunavir. (vii) TAF not only shows promise for the treatment and prevention of HIV infections, but also for the treatment of HBV infections.