5. Conclusions
In this paper, the investigation of elementary wear mechanisms in both SST and MST were carried out. A numerical approach was specially proposed for better understanding of the evolution of damage mechanisms. Particular focus was put on highlighting the effect of mechanisms interaction in the material removal process. According to the findings, the following conclusions can be drawn. The SEM observations make it possible to distinguish the elementary mechanisms dominating the material removal process in SST and their limits of action when the testing parameters, namely, the attack angle and normal vary. Inspections of multi-scratched worn area reveal high sensitivity of surface integrity to dominant interacting mechanisms. When SST, the apparent friction displays high dependency on tribological parameters. However, it shows more sensitivity to the attack angle than to the normal load. An increase in the attack angle increases lapp, and switches the wear mechanisms from ploughing to fibers pullout and fibers fracture. The wear maps reveal that ploughing, fibers multi-fractures, and fibers fracture dominate within smaller domain in MST than in SST. However, the combined fibers fracture and fibers pullout dominant mechanisms occupy a larger domain in MST. Five domains were drawn in MST face to only four domains drawn in SST. Major mechanisms transformation was outlined for relatively high load and low angle ranges: The elementary fiber multi-fractures dominating in SST becomes acting in association with fiber pullout and mode II fiber failure in MST. The proposed models exhibit excellent ability to simulate damage mechanisms dominating material removal process in both SST and MST. Specially, the mixed-mode loading criterion shows high efficiency to predict delamination propagation in the CZ. Decidedly, SEM inspections confirmed the numerical results. In fact, the MST model demonstrates ability to predict mechanisms’ interaction together with sequences of material removal process in GFRP composite.