CONCLUSIONS
The main aim of this study was to examine the seismic performance of under confined reinforced concrete columns designed before the ductile detailing codes were implemented. It is believed that this effort would enable designing suitable retrofit for these deficient columns. Towards this end, full scale stubbed square RC columns representing two under-confined columns and one reference well confined column were cast and tested. A large amount of response seismic data was collected to enable quantification of deficit in under-confined columns. Following conclusions can be drawn from this study:
A maximum reduction (attained at 3.5% drift) in lateral load capacity by 13% and in moment capacity by 24% was recorded in under-confined columns as compared to reference well confined column designed according to the current code requirements. This significantly inferior response of under confined specimens despite having similar cross section indicated the adverse effects of higher tie spacing on the lateral load capacity. This observation also signifies that, inferior confinement due to larger spacing of tie allowed dilation of core concrete at higher drift levels (>2%) which ultimately resulted to inferior flexural stresses.
A reduction in axial load carrying capacity in under-confined columns is 17% and 40% for specimens UC1 and UC2 respectively at 5% drift indicate incapability of these RC columns in maintaining the axial gravity loads during earthquake.
Displacement ductility factor of 1.9 noted in the under confined columns was 52.5% lower than the desired value of 4 and Curvature ductility factors were 76.45% and 84.65% lower than the desired values of 20 in the deficient columns. Other key deformability and energy dissipation parameters also indicate poor performance of under confined concrete columns.
This study highlights significantly lower values of structural performance indices in reinforced concrete columns designed according to the pre ductile detailing code era typical in many existing structures in seismically active areas of India and thus are in dire need of retrofitting to match current structural performance indices.