7. Discussion and comparison with the state of the art
The purpose of this work is to develop a combination paradigm to achieve robust gender, handedness and age range prediction from handwriting analysis. Recall that there are only few research works, which deal with this topic. From the results reported in Table 12, all previous works were carried out using private datasets, which does not favorite a fair quantitative comparison. Nevertheless, through methods observation, one can easily deduce the superiority of the proposed prediction systems. This is due to the incorporation of new topological and gradient features that allow local characterization of handwritten text. In addition, the Fuzzy MIN-MAX combination provides significant improvement compared to individual systems. • From all experiments, the main remark respective to softbiometrics prediction is that it is a language-independent task, since quite similar scores were obtained for Arabic and English corpuses. Unlike, IAM dataset in which, handwritten text is composed of detached characters. Arabic writing is semi-cursive, where a single word can be composed of several connectedcomponents. Also, Arabic language has its specific diacritical marking such as dumma (’), hamza (), or chadda (ω). Despite all these different properties, results of the blended corpus are typically in the same range as those of separated corpuses. • Another particularity of this work consists in performing feature generation by segmenting images into a uniform grid where features are calculated on each cell. This provides a local description of the image content. Experimental results highlighted the relationship between the gird size and the reliability of the feature characterization. Prediction accuracies obtained with individual systems, vary between 69% and 80%. The inspection along all datasets, reveals that the three SVM predictors provide satisfactory performance but there is no descriptor that allows the best discriminative power for SVM. According to the theory, such differences canpromote the accuracy improvement of a combination framework that contains not necessarily excellent classifiers, that disagree as much as possible on difficult cases [28].