دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی جذب یادگیری سازمانی توسط مدیریت دانش - امرالد 2017

عنوان فارسی
آیا یادگیری سازمانی توسط مدیریت دانش جذب می شود؟ بررسی سیستماتیک
عنوان انگلیسی
Is organizational learning being absorbed by knowledge management? A systematic review
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
28
سال انتشار
2017
نشریه
امرالد - Emerald
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
کد محصول
E6827
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت استراتژیک و مدیریت دانش
مجله
مجله مدیریت دانش - Journal of Knowledge Management
دانشگاه
Department of Business Administration - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - Bogota - Colombia
کلمات کلیدی
یادگیری سازمانی، مدیریت دانش
چکیده

Abstract


Purpose – This paper aims to focus on research regarding organizational learning (OL) and knowledge management (KM), and to specifically investigate whether OL has been conceptually absorbed by KM. Design/methodology/approach – This study is based on 16,185 articles from the Scopus and ISI Web of Science databases, using VantagePoint 10.0 software. The method used in this study is a systematic literature review covering KM and OL publications from the 1970s, when the OL field started to grow, up to 2016. Findings – Nuclear processes of OL, creation and acquisition of knowledge, have been conceptually absorbed by KM literature in the past years. Research limitations/implications – Only two databases have been considered, Scopus and ISI Web of Science, because of their academic prestige. However, these databases include a large number of articles on KM and OL. Search terms used could exclude some relevant terms, although all major descriptive terms have been included. Practical implications – This paper identifies thematic clusters in KM and OL, evolution of both fields, most cited authors and representative journals by topic. Originality/value – This is the first paper to jointly analyse the evolution of KM and OL. This paper shows a conceptual absorption of OL into KM, which may enrich academic discussion and also provide some clarity to the conceptualization of these two fields.

نتیجه گیری

6. Limitations and conclusions


The current study had some limitations. The first was that only two databases were used, i.e. Scopus and ISI Web of Science, but these were selected because of their academic prestige and breadth, as well as their extensive coverage of KM and OL studies. Second, the search terms used excluded some terms recommended by certain authors. However, the major terms were included and the effect of excluding certain terms was not expected to be significant. Third, the number of thematic categories was not formally optimized and the descriptive names used were open to other interpretations.


We conclude that OL has been gradually absorbed within KM. In particular, the characteristic OL processes of knowledge creation and acquisition are now essential parts of KM definitions, processes and studies.


We suggest that future studies should investigate the role of knowledge sharing as a connector between KM and OL. Individuals and organizations learn by sharing knowledge. According to the KM literature, knowledge sharing is the core process responsible for knowledge creation and application.


بدون دیدگاه