6. Discussion and Conclusion
The grounded theory analysis was applied to develop two conceptual models of CSR from a community perspective. The variability between models reflected differences in communities’ cultural views and community aspirations but also alternative pathways to CSR because the institutional/legislative mechanisms were different for Indigenous communities versus locally impacted mixed communities. CSR was a topic of high relevance and significance to community leaders. Defining the required elements for CSR was shaped by community leaders’ experiential knowledge including the benefits and costs to communities.
The models express a range of community views and priorities in relation to CSR. Views on CSR differed according to the individual’s personal values, political agendas, and role and responsibility. Common issues such as environmental protection, long-term sustainability and facilitating community development were spread across key representatives of both groups.
The CSR models developed followed a collaborative and participatory approach whereby communities have significant buy-in and involvement in CSR. This includes advocating approaches and processes that increase community representation and its power base.