4. Conclusions
This case study indicates that medical CT scans can produce useful data in significantly reduced times, making it a definite good option for non-destructive testing, especially for large numbers of samples and where only moderate resolution is required. Another advantage is its ability to scan larger objects than typical microCT systems (e.g. an entire concrete block could not be scanned in one scan volume on a microCT, but could have been done by 3-part scanning tripling the scan time in this case up to more than 4 hours). Data set sizes are significantly reduced, making its analysis and quick assessment faster with reduced computational power necessary. However, industrial non-destructive analysis is usually not available at medical CT facilities, therefore analysis should still be done at industrial CT facilities or with industrial CT software. The chosen test objects where specifically selected as challenging objects for microCT, i.e. they are all on the extreme limit of sample size and density possible for laboratory microCT (up to 225 kV), and therefore smaller or less dense objects will result in improved quality with respect to medical CT scans. However, larger objects will be impossible to scan with typical laboratory microCT, while medical CT could produce reasonable results, especially when only moderate resolution is required. Considering the artifacts, medical CT is however not good enough for industrial testing in general, but can find application in niche areas and for high throughput applications where critical components are tested which would not have been otherwise tested due to the time and cost constraints of typical microCT. It is envisaged that industrial non-destructive testing facilities could make use of both methods.