CONCLUSION
The results have demonstrated the elemental analysis, particularly of dental implants, depends on the technique, meaning the radiation and energy chosen as well as the selected region of interest on the sample. For surface layers, the most important region for dental implants, electron microscope coupled to EDS analysis is a suitable technique but requires some attention specially when evaluating the uncertainty, avoiding to just use the statistical one provided by the equipment, and verifying the reproducibility. Using a second method as WDS, on the other hand, allows analyzing a deeper layer of the sample. But in this case special attention to the sample geometry should be paid. The combination of both methods allows a more complete evaluation of the dental implant: the surface layer, showing the oxidation and/or coating properties as well as the characteristics of the titanium core used for the implant. The next step of our study is to analyze the temporal evolution of the surface layer when exposed to the atmosphere. And then to test different brands offered in the Brazilian market.