4 Conclusions and suggestions
4.1 A word of caution
The findings in this national analysis cannot be compared to national analyses done for other countries in the past by multiplying these results by a simple ratio of the two baselines, for two reasons. First, the UEVs for minerals are significantly different from those used in the past, which also translates into very different UEVs for the metals like steel, aluminum and copper, etc. Second, we have used a UEV for rainfall that is almost 50% lower than the UEV used by Odum (1996) and that is given in the Center for Environmental Policy, Folio 1 (Odum, 2000). The UEV used in the present study was taken from a publication by Brown and Ulgiati (2016). Since rain and the emergy of geopotential (which is computed from rain) are the most important renewable emergy inputs to Mongolia, the fact that their UEVs are about 50% lower makes simple comparison with other national analyses problematic. Add this difference to the different UEV’s for minerals and metals and a simple ratio of baselines is obviously not appropriate.