ترجمه مقاله نقش ضروری ارتباطات 6G با چشم انداز صنعت 4.0
- مبلغ: ۸۶,۰۰۰ تومان
ترجمه مقاله پایداری توسعه شهری، تعدیل ساختار صنعتی و کارایی کاربری زمین
- مبلغ: ۹۱,۰۰۰ تومان
Abstract
The introduction of an independent public sector audit function was a critical element in the nineteenth century constitutional reforms of parliamentary and government accountability and created an essential precedent for current practice. By examining the extent of scholarly research on public sector audit history, findings reveal considerable research examined the teleological development of public sector audit and the modern history in a New Public Management context. However, there has been very little published regarding the complex rationales around the origins, development and importance of independent public sector audit notwithstanding that without an appreciation of these precedents it becomes very difficult to protect the Westminster-based system of democratic government.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Since the 1980s, it would seem almost axiomatic that accounting history is critically important to the appreciation and understanding of modern practice. In this paper, the extent of public sector auditing history, with a particular emphasis on auditor-general independence, has been assessed and examined. Findings determined that public sector auditing history can be traced via three essential discourses: (1) that of gap identification and rationalisation of the importance of public sector audit history (a grouping to which this paper belongs); (2) the teleology of auditor-general independence; and (3) modern contextual analysis. There is wide-ranging research identifying the importance and need for public sector audit history examination. It has been highlighted that it is crucial for educators and policymakers to have an understanding of the history and precedent in order to properly inform and defend current public sector audit practice (Gilchrist & Coulson, 2015; Pilcher et al., 2013). Without such an appreciation, important controls in constitutional arrangements in Britain and Australia, as well as elsewhere in developed democratic countries, might appear instead as merely bureaucratic intrusions generating inefficiencies or ineffectiveness.