دانلود رایگان مقاله تاثیر رقابت داخل پلتفرم در نفوذ پهنای باند

عنوان فارسی
تاثیر رقابت داخل پلتفرم در نفوذ پهنای باند
عنوان انگلیسی
The impact of intra-platform competition on broadband penetration
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
12
سال انتشار
2016
نشریه
الزویر - Elsevier
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
کد محصول
E4537
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
مهندسی کامپیوتر و مهندسی برق
مجله
سیاست ارتباط از راه دور - Telecommunications Policy
دانشگاه
انگلستان
کلمات کلیدی
مقررات، پهنای باند، رقابت، ارتباط از راه دور، بیت، جدا کردن حلقه محلی
بخشی از ترجمه مقاله
اپراتورها در گوشه و کنار جهان برای عرضه سرویس های با پهنای باند بسیار سریع، در حال گستردن شبکه های فیبری جدید(نسل بعدی شبکه های دسترسی) هستند. بحث های زیادی در مورد نقشی که دولت ها و تنظیم کننده ها باید برای کمک به تشویق گسترش این شبکه های جدید و همچنین استعمال این سرویس های با پهنای باند سریع ایفا کنند وجود دارد. یک سوال کلیدی این است که آیا آیین نامه های دسترسی به شبکه های مسی باید به تجهیزات فیبری نیز بسط داده شوند؟ بحث اصلی به نفع آیین نامه دسترسی این است که دسترسی و ورود جدید را آسان میکند به طوری که وارد شونده باید تنها بخشی از شبکه را ایجاد کند یا اصلا هیچ شبکه ای را ایجاد ننماید. این به طور بالقوه اجازه رقابت های شدید در صورت وجود بازارگردانان زیاد را میدهد. با این حال این نگرانی وجود دارد که دسترسی اختیاری میتواند اپراتورها را در ابتدا از سرمایه گذاری در شبکه های فیبری بازدارد اگر آنها تصور کنند که تلاش میکنند تا سرمایه اولیه خود را بازگردانند.
چکیده

abstract


There has been an extensive debate about the role of broadband access regulation on market outcomes. This paper estimates the impact that the different modes of competition have had on broadband take-up to date, using a data set for EU27 countries. We find that ULL, which is one of main types of access-based competition in Europe, has had a positive impact on broadband take-up. However, the impact of ULL becomes smaller as its share increases. That is, ULL entry is less effective in areas where ULL take up is already high. Further, there is evidence of a crowding out effect between ULL and inter-platform competition. This means that ULL is less effective in enhancing broadband penetration in the areas where alternative networks already have a significant share of broadband lines.


1. Introduction


Operators around the world are deploying new fibre networks (next generation access networks or NGAs) in order to offer very high-speed broadband services. There has been much debate about the role that governments and regulators should play in helping to encourage the deployment these new networks and encourage the adoption of ultra-fast broadband services. A key question is whether access based obligations over copper networks should be extended to fibre infrastructures. The main argument in favour of access regulation is that it makes new entry easier, as the entrant has to build only part of a network, or no network at all. This potentially allows for more intense competition if there is a greater number of market players. However, there is a concern that mandating access could deter operators’ from investing in fibre networks in the first place if the operators think that they will struggle to make a return on their original investment.

نتیجه گیری

5. Conclusion and policy implications


There has been an extensive debate about the impact of broadband access regulation. This is especially relevant at the moment given the current debate about the best way of encouraging the roll-out and take-up of new fibre broadband services. This paper looks at the impact of access based entry (or intra-platform competition) on the take-up of broadband services using a data set for EU27 countries. Our main result is that ULL had in general a positive impact on take-up - a result that is robust to a wide range of specifications. The impact of inter-platform competition is of a similar magnitude in our main specification, although its impact is more sensitive to the specification used. This may well be because the share of inter-platform competition has shown less variation over time within countries, which makes it more difficult to accurately estimate its impact. The results for bitstream and resale are more volatile. In some specifications the results are insignificant, whereas in other specifications the results are negative. For copper networks, the European Commission has put significant emphasis on ULL. This is consistent with the results found for ULL. If these results are at least partly a reflection of the regulatory approach to ULL on copper networks, the implication would be that the regulatory approach to wholesale broadband access on copper could also impact the take-up of fibre based broadband.


بدون دیدگاه