دانلود رایگان مقاله متانوژن ها و باکتری های شکمبه ای در گوسفند

Abstract

Microbial fermentation of carbohydrates in the rumen is largely responsible for the emission of methane by ruminants. Ruminants fed tropical forages usually produce more enteric methane than ruminants fed temperate forages. The relative influence of forage type, breed and temperate vs tropical environment on rumen microbial populations is not known. This experiment aimed to separate these effects. We designed two parallel experiments in sheep in two sites: temperate (France) and tropical (French West Indies), using in each site two breeds, Texel (temperate origin), and Blackbelly (tropical origin) fed the same temperate forages (C3 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality) and tropical forages (C4 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality). We determined diet digestibility, ruminal end-products of fermentation and microbial groups: total protozoa, methanogens and bacteria, and selected fibrolytic bacteria. Dry matter digestibility coefficient was higher in tropical site (612 vs 580 g/kg on average, P = 0.004) but no difference was observed between C3 and C4 forages. There was no effect of site on total VFA concentration, but the acetate:propionate ratio was higher for the tropical site (4.30 vs 3.93 on average, P = 0.007). The acetate:propionate ratio was also affected by forage type with higher values for C3 than C4 forage (4.24 vs 3.99 on average, P = 0.03). Concentration of total rumen bacteria and methanogens was determined by qPCR targeting, respectively, the rrs (16S ribosomal RNA subunit) and mcrA (methyl coenzyme-M reductase) genes. For both groups, the number of gene copies per gram of DM rumen content was higher in the tropical site (P < 0.001). For cellulolytic bacteria, higher number of rrs copies per gram of DM of rumen content were detected for Fibrobacter succinogenes in the temperate site (P < 0.001), whereas no differences were observed for Ruminococcus flavefaciens or Ruminococcus albus numbers between sites, breeds and forage type. Protozoa numbers determined by counting did not vary between sites, forages or breeds, but a site × forage interaction was observed (P = 0.01): there were more protozoa and R. albus in tropical sites for tropical forages. Our results suggest that rumen microbiota was mainly influenced by environment (temperate vs tropical) and that forage type (C3 vs C4) and breed had minor effects. However, an interaction between environment and forage type was observed for some variables.

5. Conclusion

This study shows that the differences observed in the rumen microbiota of sheep between tropical and temperate sites were intrinsic to the location and could not be attributed to local forages (temperate C3 vs tropical C4) or breeds. Total bacteria and methanogens were more abundant in the tropical site. This study also shows the adaptation capacity of each breed to its environment, suggested by the site × breed interaction. Future work should characterize the microbiota using high-throughput sequencing for phylogenetic and metagenomic analysis to gain a better understanding of the influence of the environment in shaping rumen populations.