6. Conclusions
The social-scientific analysis of national-level transport policy and practice presented herein demonstrates the need for greater alignment between public debates and policy development both within and beyond the transport sector. Moreover, the findings call for fresh thinking regarding public investment and divestment that incorporates insights from social-scientific and interdisciplinary transport research and that prioritises sustainable transport over and above individual motorised transport. As demonstrated throughout the paper, short-term reactions to an economic crisis, especially cost-cutting measures and an over-emphasis on lowcost and no-cost transport solutions, are unlikely to produce a fully functioning, future-proof sustainable transport system. Instead, what is needed is a combination of wide-ranging, cross-sectoral policy changes and re-allocation of transport funding. Recent changes in EU transport policy and practice towards multi-annual transport budgets, closer links between transport and land use policy, investment in public transport, especially rail, and a greater emphasis on changing transport-related norms and mobility practices have opened up promising pathways that could benefit highly car-dependent EU member-states such as Ireland. Moreover, revelations in September 2015 regarding the manipulation of car emissions levels by large car manufacturers point to the crucial role of trustworthy state and non-state institutions that are fully committed to sustainable transport. Here,the future significance of sustainable transport NGOs and advocacy groups should not be underestimated.