5. Conclusions
The aim of this paper was to analyze the simultaneous implementation of an IMS in a SME, together with the analysis of the costs incurred. The single case study presented allows posing the following conclusions, although they should be taken with caution because a single case was realized.
First, the results show that a simultaneous integration is possible (as proposed by Labodová, 2004), and more effective and efficient than implementing the MS standards sequentially. The organization decided to implement directly the IMS mainly for internal motivations and also because the experience of the external consultant helped them to learn from previous practices, implementing both MSs, ISO 9001 and ISO 14001, at the same time and as a single system (see, e.g. Douglas and Glen, 2000; Llach et al., 2013).
In terms of the integration of MSs process, the sequence of implementing these two MSs could be considered as more than simultaneous, because it was integrated or implementing the IMS directly. This is one of the main contributions of this study because previous proposals, such as Karapetrovic and Willborn (1998a), proposed the implementation of MSs individually, even the simultaneous proposal was considering the implementation of both MSs at the same time, but not integratedly (see, e.g. Douglas and Glen, 2000; Karapetrovic et al., 2006; Salomone, 2008; Bernardo et al., 2009; Abad et al., 2014). In this paper, although it is only a case, it is proved that an IMS could be implemented and thus, adding a new option of implementation sequence. Labodová (2004) also proposed this type of implementation as an option and with the case presented in this paper, an evidence of this implementation has been provided.