Discussion
The hidden lesion, as described by Walch et al.2 in open repairs of the supraspinatus, is still pertinent in the age of arthroscopy. Both Bennett3 and Koo and Burkhart4 have documented techniques to aid in the arthroscopic identification of subscapularis tears. However, visualization of the entire subscapularis attachment is not possible arthroscopically, given the anatomic relations with the coracohumeral ligament and medial pulley.5 By removing the rotator interval and medial pulley, complete visualization of the subscapularis attachment is obtained, thus allowing for identification of a hidden lesion. When clinical suspicion of a subscapularis lesion is present, we believe this technique allows for adequate visualization of the subscapularis attachment and reduces the risk of missing a lesion during arthroscopy. There are some risks and limitations with the described technique (Table 2). Most important, clinical suspicion of a hidden lesion must exist to use this technique because the additional dissection and operative time required may result in inferior surgical outcomes. Meticulous dissection of the rotator interval and medial pulley is paramount because aggressive or misplaced dissection can damage the supraspinatus or subscapularis tendon.