6. Discussion and Conclusion
The Internet regulation policy in China has attracted world-wide research interest. Without penetrating deeply in different people’s reactions to the censorship under different conditions, it is difficult to understand how the censorship policy is perceived by the public and exerts influence on the public. The current study identified a causal relationship between Internet censorship infrastructure endorsed by Chinese government and Chinese Internet users’ tendency of self-censorship, which was measured by the willingness to speak about sensitive topics and the behavior of signing petition for information access freedom. Although self-censorship of journalists, activists and scholars had been studied in prior literature, very few efforts had been made to explore how ordinary people react to the censorship system, even fewer research tried to build a causation link between censorship and self-censorship. As Tai (2014) discovered, Chinese government’s regulation on new media is tougher and more sophisticated than that over traditional media. The finding of this study suggests that Chinese government has successfully induced self-censorship in not just the elite but also the general public, especially well-educated young people, consequently, will silence discrepant opinions and deteriorate the environment of speech freedom. However, the insights from Roberts’ (2015) study showed that total information blackouts may inspire rivalry and undermine government legitimacy eUorts. It is possible that someday self-censorship may be converted into or replaced by resistance. Future study may need to explore the relationship between self-censorship and resistance, as well as the conditions under which the two consequences of censorship will take place and transform to each other.