11. Conclusions
This paper sheds light on the resilience value and its trajectories in urban design, moving from the descriptive approach on one side of the resilience continuum to the far end whereas more normative sense applied in order to identify the measurability of the term. This is accompanied with the general concern of turning resilience conception it into amorphous idea as there are so many definitions and descriptions for the term in various fields. A critical leap is required from the generality of the descriptive approach in addressing resilience to a more normative sense. Resilience need to be addressed clearly and individually in the designated system of interest.
The role of resilient ecological-urban design to flood is very much linked to the vital commodity of accessibility outlined in this paper. In the urban design discipline, access was found to be the critical commodity for city survivor. That’s because it is associated with flood consequences, identified earlier as; indirect losses and secondary impact, where the indirect losses are the cost of goods that will not be produced and services that will not be provided during and aftermath. Since important good and services in a time of crisis require access to be produced and provided, vital access between goods-services’ provider and potential vulnerable consumers will be of relevance. Connectivity and access can be maintained by physical interventions for people to access safety destination and for the surface runoff to gently flow towards natural downstream without disturbing the urban context with inundation.