Conclusions and policy implications
The objective of this research was to investigate the impact of energy consumption—both renewable and non-renewable— and income on CO2 emissions within the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) model for MERCOSUR countries. Four hypotheses were raised: H1—there is a positive and significant relationship between income and emission of pollutants in MERCOSUR countries; H2—there is a negative and significant relationship between consumption of renewable energy and emission of pollutants in MERCOSUR countries; H3—there are positive and significant relationships between consumption of non-renewable energy and emission of pollutants in MERCOSUR countries; and H4—there is a quadratic relationship between income and emission of pollutants, as in the EKC hypothesis.
On the basis of the results presented, it was possible to confirm the four hypotheses of the research. With the estimation of Eqs. 1 and 2, hypotheses 3 and 4 were confirmed, as the consumption of renewable and non-renewable energy, respectively, negatively and positively impact CO2 emissions. With the estimation of Eqs. 3 and 4, it was possible to confirm hypothesis 1 and 4, in addition to hypotheses 2 and 3, thereby confirming the positive impact of economic development, measured by GDP, on CO2 emissions, and also confirming the hypothesis of EKC.
Empirical results reported in this research are robust and reliable due to the use of appropriate estimation techniques. The elasticities found imply major economic policy implications for MERCOSUR. Policy measures which constrain energy consumption slow down economic growth. When the economy grows, demand for energy also increases. However, this path is energy-saving and reduces the share of nonrenewable energy and increases the share of renewable energy for the lower levels of CO2 emissions. Policymakers should focus more on public awareness of renewable energy and environmental quality, mainly in solar and wind power, whose sources of generation are abundant in MERCOSUR countries.