3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterizations of Co3O4/NSGF composites Fig. 1a depicts XRD patterns of the synthesized samples. Pure GF sample exhibited a broad diffraction peak (005) at 2 = 25.8◦. In the case of 1:1 Co3O4/NSGF hybrid, the (111), (220), (311), (222), (400),(422),(440) and(511)peaksmatched well withthose of cubic Co3O4 (PDF-#78-1969). And Co3O4 were also formed in 1:2 and 2:1 Co3O4/NSGF composites. The strong peaks suggested the high crystallinity of Co3O4 nanoparticles (NPs). The nitrogen adsorptiondesorption isotherm (Fig. 1b) assessing the porous nature clearly shows a type isotherm IV indicative of the existence of mesopores and macropores. The average pore size in the pore size distribution curve (Fig. 1b inset) was around 82.3 nm and tC-S-Che BET surface area was 90.2 m2 g−1, resulting from the occurrence of partial pore blockage [27]. Details of the morphology and structure of the hybrids were characterized by SEM and TEM. Both graphene foam (GF) and graphene oxide foam (GOF) exhibit intense interconnected network morphology (Fig. 2a and b). For 1:1 Co3O4/NSGF, cubic Co3O4 NPs were observed on the GF sheets or in the holes (Fig. 2c, d and f). While the Co3O4 particles did not grow well in 1:2 and 2:1 Co3O4/NSGF composites (see Supporting information Fig. S1a and b). TEM images showed that the GOF and the GF were crumbled with covered sheets (Supplementary Fig. S1c, Fig. 2e, agreeing well with SEM results. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image given in Fig. 2g clearly displays that lattice fringe spacing of Co3O4 was around 0.27 nm, and the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (the insetin Fig. 2h) demonstrated Co3O4 was of single crystalline form, and the first diffraction areas corresponded to (111) surface plane of Co3O4. Details of study have demonstrated thatthe exposed Co3O4 (111) surface contributed a lot to OER [3,13].