5. Conclusion
The diversity of political, sociocultural and infrastructural factors that exist in each country may impede the establishment of a single ethical approach to international collaborative genetics/genomics research that will be effective in all contexts. However, as the GSNESTT experience proves, drawing on the published experiences of other projects, it is possible to identify key areas in HGR that require special attention and then integrate several previously tested mechanisms to address many ethical issues that may arise. Novel approaches integrated into the GSNESTT include the use of a local trained in clinical psychology to lead the informed consent process, and developing an audit protocol to assure the quality and validity of the informed consent process. It is critical that any framework developed also addresses key areas outlined in international guidelines like the CIOMS. Care must also be taken at every step to ensure that study protocols are sensitive to the culture and terrain of each community or subgroup targeted within a country. Community engagement and recruitment is a resource and laborintensive aspect of the project, and required creativity and flexibility to achieve successful implementation. Our experience suggests that for research projects involving genetics to be successful, ethical issues must be integrated into the design and implementation of the project. The value and importance of identifying and meaningfully engaging with all interested stakeholders, prior to a major project, and throughout its evolution, cannot be overstated. Failure to do so can lead to costly delays and may potentially undermine the viability of the research. Building on the GSNESTT, we recommend that further investment is made to develop community education in genetics and the implications of genetics research in Trinidad and Tobago.