دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی پیاده سازی اصول یادگیری حرکتی در تمرینات فیزیوتراپی: استنباط فیزیوتراپیست - تیلور و فرانسیس 2017

عنوان فارسی
پیاده سازی اصول یادگیری حرکتی در تمرینات فیزیوتراپی: تحقیق درباره استنباط فیزیوتراپیست و پیاده سازی گزارش شده
عنوان انگلیسی
Implementation of motor learning principles in physical therapy practice: Survey of physical therapists’ perceptions and reported implementation
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
13
سال انتشار
2017
نشریه
تیلور و فرانسیس
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
نوع مقاله
ISI
پایگاه
اسکوپوس
کد محصول
E9055
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
پزشکی
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
فیزیوتراپی
مجله
نظریه فیزیوتراپی و تمرین - Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
دانشگاه
Department of Physical Therapy - Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences - University of Haifa - Israel
کلمات کلیدی
پزشکی مبتنی بر شواهد؛ یادگیری خودرو؛ فیزیوتراپی؛ خود کارآمدی؛ بررسی
doi یا شناسه دیجیتال
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1456585
چکیده

ABSTRACT


Introduction: The field of motor learning (ML) plays a pivotal role in physical therapy (PT), and its implementation has been shown to improve intervention outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess physical therapists’ ML-related self-efficacy, self-reported implementation, and environmental workplace factors. An additional aim was to report the psychometric properties of a questionnaire that was developed to assess the above-mentioned constructs. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional survey was completed by 289 physical therapists (average age: 38.7 (9.7), with 11.3 (9.7) years of experience and 74% female). Construct validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability were tested. The main outcome measures were the scores of the three scales of the questionnaire, referring to self-efficacy in ML, implementation of ML principles, and workplace environment features. Results: The questionnaire had sound psychometric qualities. Respondents perceived ML as an integral part of PT. ML-related self-efficacy and implementation of ML principles were moderate (2.95/5 (0.7) and 3.04/5 (0.8), respectively). PT practice had a significant effect on ML-related self-efficacy (p = 0.035) and implementation (p = 0.0031). Respondents who had undergone ML training in their graduate program reported higher ML-related self-efficacy (p = 0.007). Respondents who had postgraduate training in ML reported significantly more extensive implementation (p = 0.024). Lack of knowledge and lack of time were perceived as the major barriers to implementation. Conclusions: Level of self-efficacy might be insufficient to support the systematic implementation of ML principles in practice. Addressing impeding individual- and organizational-level factors might facilitate ML self-efficacy and implementation. Postgraduate education facilitates ML implementation.

نتیجه گیری

Conclusions


The study sheds light on the current state of ML selfefficacy among PTs, self-reported implementation, and possible barriers for implementation of ML principles. PTs confirmed that ML is an important part of physiotherapy practice; however, there are gaps between the extent of theoretical knowledge of ML principles in the literature and their implementation in clinical practice. PTs have moderate self-efficacy in the field of ML, which may be insufficient to support a high standard of implementation. The findings distinguished between ML concepts that may be easier to understand and implement and concepts that are more challenging to master. The findings confirm the contribution of postgraduate education in facilitating ML implementation.


بدون دیدگاه