SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
We conclude by offering some perspectives and conclusions to our analysis. When we wrote our initial paper on the financial interplay of branding and accounting (Sinclair and Keller, 2014), we covered two distinct -- but related -- accounting anomalies:
• The main thrust of the paper was to encourage the accounting standard setters to review the omission that brands which are acquired are identified as assets, but brands which are internally generated are not.
• We also drew attention to the business combination requirement that acquired brands are measured at their transaction value and tested annually for impairment. There is no recognition of the opposite; a gain in value or accretion.
We have since given this phenomenon a name: ‘‘The Moribund Effect.’’ This is the phenomenon under which, no matter how a company performs over time, the value of the brand that was acquired, measured, and added to the balance sheet remains unchanged. It is carried at its transaction value. Any relationship it might have to enterprise wealth (e.g., as a contributor to the market premium), or any gain in absolute terms, is hidden from view.