دانلود رایگان مقاله یک معیار مالکیت معنوی جدید برای فعالیت های استاندارد سازی

عنوان فارسی
یک معیار مالکیت معنوی جدید برای فعالیت های استاندارد سازی
عنوان انگلیسی
A new intellectual property metric for standardization activities
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
12
سال انتشار
2016
نشریه
الزویر - Elsevier
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
کد محصول
E4712
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
تکنولوژی صنعتی
مجله
تکنولوژی - Technovation
دانشگاه
سازمان تحقیق جامع، دانشگاه وستا، توکیو، ژاپن
کلمات کلیدی
استاندارد سازی، تحقیق و توسعه، حق ثبت اختراع استاندارد، معادله برداری، ثبت اختراع منفی، پارادوکس SEP ، تعریف مجدد مالکیت معنوی، مجتمع IP
۰.۰ (بدون امتیاز)
امتیاز دهید
چکیده

abstract


This study formulates a method to measure the effects of standardization to assist in evaluating innovation and R&D policies. Its main purpose is to examine standardization activities within R&D organizations. This allows for a more appropriate policy evaluation framework than examining such activities within standard development organizations does. The study also redefines the conventional notion of intellectual property (IP) normatively and introduces the term “integrated IP” to reflect our new concept of joining IP and standardization activities. Our new concept captures the “fuzzy” impact of standardization on R&D to improve innovation management. The study presents a vector equation expressing the new IP definition and uses it to model revenues arising from a standard-essential patent for strategic IP management with standardization. The model indicates the importance of patents commercially required for product differentiation for the purpose of innovation with standards.

نتیجه گیری

6. Discussion


Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that hightechnology and R&D-intensive corporations are more patent-oriented and less standardization-oriented (Blind, 2006). In fact, Japan's high-technology industry appears to have been more standardization-oriented during the period studied. It is notable that our metric of the standardization factor is not the conventional standardization activities studied previously but a new metric that specifically measures standardization related to intellectual property. This difference in the scope of standardization metrics likely explains the result observed.


بدون دیدگاه