4. Discussion
In this study, we present a novel technique to accurately segment multiple structures. In opposition to the majority of the state-of-the-art techniques, constraints to allow thin walls between multiple structures are embedded. Furthermore, when compared with previous works addressing the same issue (Gao et al., 2012), the proposed formulation appears to present a superior performance for the delineation of heterogeneous and noisy walls, keeping a minimal wall thickness for all the different scenarios. This technique was integrated into an efficient 3D segmentation framework and the advantages of the novel competitive methodology was proven for atrial body segmentation. Note that evaluation of the mid thin walls is relevant in several clinical evaluations, such as optimal inter-atrial puncture location for transseptal puncture (Morais et al., 2016) and for the evaluation of the aortic wall thickness (Malayeri et al., 2008). To the author’s best knowledge, no previous work was presented for accurate segmentation of the atrial region with intact mid-thin walls, being a clear novelty of this work. Previous works as (Ecabert et al., 2011) and (Zuluaga et al., 2013) simply merge the different contours (if overlap happens) or prevented gap/vacuum regions, being sub-optimal strategies for clinical evaluation of these thin regions. Although no significant differences are expected between the merged contour strategies and our approach in terms of segmentation evaluation metrics (e.g. P2S or Dice), the merged contour approaches are not suitable for novel image-guided minimally invasive interventions focused on atrial wall as presented by (Bourier et al., 2016).