دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی تعریف نوآوری در جراحی مغز و اعصاب: نتایج بررسی بین المللی - الزویر 2018

عنوان فارسی
تعریف نوآوری در جراحی مغز و اعصاب: نتایج یک بررسی بین المللی
عنوان انگلیسی
Defining Innovation in Neurosurgery: Results from an International Survey
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
27
سال انتشار
2018
نشریه
الزویر - Elsevier
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
نوع مقاله
ISI
نوع نگارش
مقالات پژوهشی (تحقیقاتی)
رفرنس
دارد
پایگاه
اسکوپوس
کد محصول
E9613
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
پزشکی
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
مغز و اعصاب
مجله
جراحی مغز و اعصاب جهانی - World Neurosurgery
دانشگاه
Cushing Neurosurgery Outcomes Center - Department of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital - USA
کلمات کلیدی
جراحی مغز و اعصاب، نوآوری، بررسی، اخلاق، بین المللی
doi یا شناسه دیجیتال
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.142
چکیده

Abstract


Background: Innovation is a part of the daily practice of neurosurgery. A clear definition of what constitutes innovation is currently lacking, however, and opinions vary from continent to continent, from hospital to hospital, and from surgeon to surgeon. Methods: In this study, we distributed an online survey to neurosurgeons from multiple countries to investigate what neurosurgeons consider innovative, by gathering opinions on several hypothetical cases. The anonymous survey consisted of a total of 52 questions and took approximately 10 minutes to complete. Results: A total of 355 neurosurgeons across all continents excluding Antarctica completed the survey. Neurosurgeons achieved consensus (>75%) in considering specific cases to be innovative, including laser resection of meningioma, focused ultrasound for tumor, oncolytic virus, DBS for addiction, and photodynamic therapy for tumor. Although the new dura substitute case was not considered innovative, there was consensus among neurosurgeons indicating that IRB approval was still necessary to maintain ethical standards. Furthermore, although 90% of neurosurgeons considered an oncolytic virus for GBM to be innovative, only 78% believed that IRB approval was necessary prior to 68 treatment. Conclusions: Our results indicate that innovation is a heterogeneous concept among neurosurgeons that necessitates standardization to ensure appropriate patient safety without stifling progress. We discuss the ethical drawbacks of not having a clear definition of innovation, the current challenges in achieving a unified understanding of innovation in neurosurgery, and offer suggestions for uniting the field going forward.

نتیجه گیری

 Conclusion


This study indicates that neurosurgeons lack a clear definition of innovation. This lack of consensus poses practical and ethical concerns relevant to appropriate oversight of innovative procedures. Surgeons should actively seek critical feedback on new ideas from peers and relevant stakeholders in a collaborative environment. In the future, appropriate  steps should be taken to define innovation in neurosurgery so that neurosurgeons can use innovation to advance the field of neurosurgery without the risk of compromising patient safety.


بدون دیدگاه