6. Conclusion
Previous studies have found that farm size is one of the necessary inputs for assessing land use efficiency. However, it is a challenge to incorporate heterogeneity in land quality per unit when evaluating the performance of land in e.g., corn planting. In this study, we sought to fill this research gap by estimating the production function and technical inefficiency model, on the basis of which we calculated values of land performance indicator (LPI). The results showed that the mean technical efficiency (TE) of the farms studied was 0.77, which means that output could be increased by 23% without a change of inputs if all agricultural production units learned from the best performing production units (i.e., those with the highest levels of TE).
The results also showed that the mean LPI was 0.273, with a maximum value of 1.0, indicating that there is a large gap between the minimum optimum use of cultivated land TLPP and the observed TLPP. This indicates in turn that the agricultural production units studied can achieve the same outputs with less land inputs, e.g. the agricultural output can be increase not necessary by increasing the land area size, but more attention might be paid on how to improve the cultivated land productivity per unit. This finding corroborates the rationality and potential of the “storing food in the land” policy.