Conclusion
This paper concludes an interesting phenomenon on how professional accountants apply the provisions of IAS 38 and its exclusion on intangible assets and the views of Sharīʿah scholars’ in line with related requirements in Islam. The professional accountants’ views appear to be premised on economic choice consideration. In other words, they are investor-centric. Sharīʿah scholars, on the other hand, are concerned with the social choice consideration of compliance and stakeholder interest. Though both accountants and Sharīʿah scholars agree on the key dimensions of intangible asset reporting, variations arise due to a broader perception of intangible assets as including financial instruments and monetized assets. The central concern is the effect of this treatment on the contracting parties who rely on the sufficiency of the information disclosed for their informed decisions. Economic decision usefulness as propagated by the financial reporting standards in reporting intangible assets would require additional disclosures on the intangible component of tangible assets in terms of Sharīʿah compliance and risk-based disclosures.