Conclusions
This case study identifies that carbon storage in the pool of HWPs could be underestimated, depending on the accounting method chosen. In the case of the Czech Republic, the results have shown that the annual carbon inflow into the pool is substantially higher when estimated by the tier 3 method as compared with the tier 2 method. It also means that the Czech Republic has a potential to account a higher carbon stock in HWP, and this may promote the production and use of long-life wood products. The higher carbon inflow into the pool calculated with the tier 3 method was mainly associated with industrial residue use for the production of primary wood products and country-specific carbon conversion factors. In the case of the Czech Republic, the estimated carbon stock is also higher when country-specific half-life values are applied. Nevertheless, the results indicated that, in the Czech Republic, there is a significant potential to increase the amount of accountable carbon in HWPs without increasing forest harvest levels. The main obstacle for a wider application of the tier 3 method is the scarcity of country-specific data on HWPs and the entire wood processing chain, specifically secondary production. In most of the countries, detailed data on HWPs required for adopting the tier 3 method do not exist. This gap could be filled by periodically conducted MFA in the forest-based sector as demonstrated in this study.